.Google's Martin Splitt addressed a concern in the SEO Workplace Hrs podcast concerning whether reproducing YouTube video clip content into text on a website page would certainly be considered duplicate material as well as possess an adverse effect on the website ranks.Although duplicate information is actually not a damaging ranking aspect, content released on an extra authoritative internet site can create the information on the less reliable internet site to become outed perform. It's a legitimate inquiry to talk to given that material on a reliable will definitely outrank the very same web content on a less authoritative one.Some in the hunt community describe one part of content usurping the rankings of one more as 'cannibalization' of the web page's ranking capacity. This is the concern of the individual requesting the question.Google.com's Martin Splitt narrated the provided inquiry:." If I produce a YouTube video recording and then take that exact text or even web content and also area it on a website page, could Google.com flag that website or even web site for reproduce information?".Different Content Media Are Dealt With As Different.Martin Splitt answered that the two kinds of content are actually various and will definitely not be actually alleviated as the very same information, hence releasing text message material removed from a video will certainly not be actually looked at replicate information.This is his response:." Zero, one is a video recording and also the other one is message content, which will be actually one-of-a-kind material!".Publishing Removed Text From Video Recording.Martin applauded the suggestion of removing text content coming from a video clip and publishing it as content, taking note that some folks prefer to eat material in message form rather than viewing a video recording. Switching the flow of content from text to sound or even video recording is actually possibly certainly not a bad suggestion additionally because some folks possess issue checking out text information as well as may choose listening to it from an online video or even a podcast layout.Martin commented on printing online video material in a textual variation:." It is actually additionally not a poor suggestion, some users (like me) may like a message variation and also others may certainly not be able to utilize a video clip version of the content from the beginning as a result of data transfer or graphic restrictions.".Takeaways.The suggestion responsible for the concern is actually repurposing material and it is actually an excellent suggestion. Explore is actually more than Google, it's also YouTube and anywhere folks receive their audio material, like Spotify. The fact that there is no cannibalization of the content in between mediums makes repurposing a realistic method to stretching your content scope.Pay attention to the podcast at the 8:20 moment mark:.Featured Graphic by Shutterstock/Roman Samborskyi.